In the category of closing the barn door after the cow has escaped, we now have the banning of the Da Vinci Code movie after it has had a 22 day run there and has exceeded all expectations in ticket sales. Here is the link--
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/10/world/asia/10china.html?th&emc=th
This seems to have been the response of the Chinese government trying to appease the Catholic Patriot League, but also responding to the 'social unrest' and various protests the movie had caused in the last few weeks there. Of course this tactic only makes those Catholics look like obscurantists and censors unfortunately. Nevertheless, it is an irony that the Communist government in China has been more sensitive to Christian feelings on this matter than all the Western governments put together! It also shows, that at least some governmental officials understand that this movie is definitely not "much ado about nothing".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Of course, while everything that you said seems true to me, there is another perspective:
Regardless of the Da Vinci Code's relative lack of merit and its flagrant abuse of history, you shouldn't simply ban something because some people don't like it, or because it offends your and their moral sensibilities. And I know I don't have to tell you why not. Such bans, while being morally wrong in an important way, also never work out quite how you'd hope they would. They make the powers that be look afraid of something, thus making whatever it is that they seem afraid of much more appealing. The "bad guys" suddenly become much more sympathetic characters.
I agree with you Sandalstraps--- I'm not for censorship as it has the boomerang effect.
And as for governmental sensitivity, it is indeed the duty of the government to protect free speech-- and this includes the rights of Christians to protest all they want about things they see as immoral. This in turn means they have the right to protest the banning of God's name in public venues as a form of censorship of free speech, no matter what the ACLU may say.
Blessings,
Ben
I beg to disagree. i think this book and movie have made people here very interested in Jesus - and can become a great tool of God.
Banning it is NOT the way forward IMHO - not if we are serious about our faith.
Post a Comment